Sunday, January 23, 2022

Impact: Does Classroom Design Help Teaching in a COVID World?

The Context 

In September of 2020, I wrote about how I set up my classroom going in to teaching in a COVID context.  Since then, I've had the chance to think about the role classroom design has on teaching in a COVID context.  

  

To recap, in September of 2020: 

  • Students were distanced as much as possible, and at that time, there was no mask mandate for students.   
  • We spent as much time handwashing as we did reading. 
  • I put up the transparent screens for students at tables. 
  • We restricted movement down the halls as much as possible. 
  • We didn't share supplies, and we reduced contact and face to face communication. 
  • We kept to our own classes, and even had separate play zones outside with staggered entry times, play times, lunch times, and exit times.   
  • It was a tense time because we didn't know really how COVID was transmitted and teachers were constantly second-guessing themselves on how to keep 20-odd children, themselves (and by extension, their families), and their colleagues safe. 

 


Does Classroom Design Have Any Impact? 


At first glance, I might say that classroom design had little to no impact on learning in a COVID context.  Why?  Because by the end of the year, all my students progressed and learned a lot, and we built a tight-knit classroom community.  In September, it was like herding cats because most students had not set foot in a classroom in 6 months, and had the double-whammy of having atrophied academic skills (What is reading again?) and atrophied public social skills (What do you mean I can't lie on the floor, close my eyes, and eat Cheezies? Where is the fast-forward button on my teacher?).   


I could not rely on my classroom (the Third Teacher) to help me support my students the ways it used to.  The kids who needed to walk around the classroom had to stay put.  The kids who needed to stand up could, but only hunched over their desks (no risers, no high chairs, no standing at the window counter).  The kids who learned best by stretching out or lying down couldn't (no risers, no carpets).  The kids who learned best with a partner or in a small group could not gather (no "watering holes", no risers, no kitchen tables, not small meeting areas).  The kids who needed a spot for themselves could not find one (no "caves", no egg chairs, no zen dens).  I could not use some my favourite aspects of my classroom, to support diverse learners.   


Well, at least not in the ways I usually did.  

 

Classroom Design has a huge impact, but the rules changed.


Now, looking back, teaching in a COVID context was actually an on-going classroom design challenge.  In the same way that desks with inkwells and fixed seats "worked" for the students and learning of the time, my risers and alternate seating worked for the kind of learning and learners I wanted, pre-pandemic.  I had to shift my thinking within a COVID context. 


Here are some of the design choices we played with to support learning in a COVID context: 


Strategic Seating 

  • Kids who needed to stand a lot were placed at the back or on the sides so they could stand without obstructing the view of others.  Later, we had some designated counter spots so specific kids could stand and work.   
  • After having a conversation about giving students what they needed, we brought back the wobble chairs for students who needed to move. 

Strategic Lighting 
  • Like before, we raised the light level to increase student energy and alertness, and brought it down, when we needed to calm things down.   
  • We brought in additional cheap, but attractive lighting to hang from the ceiling, and made sure we used warm-coloured bulbs instead of the bright, sharp ultra-white bulbs.  The whole class could be lit from these lamps with a warm glow instead of the built-in overhead lighting.   
  • We used natural light from the windows, but in grey Vancouver, the light was augmented by the hanging lamps.  We also added cotton curtains to soften the boxy rectangle dominance of the room.  These also came in handy when we had a bright hot spell (so hot that schools were shut down --- a first for Vancouver!). 


Personal “Spaces” 
  • We built individual storage boxes.  They reduced the amount of movement around the classroom, had a small footprint because they were upright, and could be taken outside.  Because I used some gloss white cabinet sheeting, the sides could be used as a whiteboard. 
  •   

  • Personal whiteboards.  These could fit in the storage boxes and could be used in a number of ways.  To reduce talking, yelling, and breathing all of over each other, students had chats, votes, and conversations by writing on the mini-whiteboards and holding them up.   
  • Whisper Phones.  I first heard of these from my friend, Kyme, who used them to help students with their reading fluency.  Whisper Phones are just some elbow piping from the hardware store in the shape of a phone hand set. If you whisper in one end with your mouth, you can hear yourself very clearly in the earpiece, and no one else can hear you or be disturbed.  A little bit of self-talk privacy for a couple of bucks?  Love it.   
  • Cloakroom.  I crammed the cloakrooms full of stuff because I knew students would not be using them because of the close contact gathering.  (And where else could I put my dismantled risers?)  But every once in a while, in a pinch, students would ask to cram themselves in there, in between the junk and the corner, away from the world.  For them, it was a calm, safe, isolated space.   
  • We also did a lot of closed-eyes visualization.  Sometimes the best way to get some privacy is to close your eyes.   
  • Outside In, Inside Out 
    • We went outside. We ran around the field, we walked through the neighbourhood, we had great conversations and explorations in the forest, we painted pictures or drew chalk art on the blacktop, we took our lapdesks and did our work outside.  Generally, every time we went outside, it was positive, fun, and freeing.   
    • Inside, we opened the windows to let the fresh air in, and the recirculated breath out. 

  


Tech.  The computer, TV, and doc cam became my go-to tools.   
  • My cobbled-together doc cam was my right arm.  I showed techniques live on a sheet or whiteboard while the class could watch on the big TV.  I could record these demos.  Without the intimacy of gathering together students on the carpet, I can bring the class together by reading them a story where every child can see the pages on the big TV.  
  • We watched lessons, slide presentations, videos and demos on TV.  During lunch, students could not talk because their masks were off, so to keep them calm and occupied, we would watch nature scenes on TV.  If you’ve been to one of my workshops, you’ll know about “fancy restaurant mode”: we turn down the overhead lights, put out a few electric tealights, put on some light jazz music, and shows views from the fanciest restaurants in the world on the TV; the students go into “fancy restaurant mode”, acting calm, using their manners and hushed voices.  It’s a simulated urban oasis, and a good way to travel when you can’t travel.   
  •  

  • The computer was also the link to our home learners.  In September, we started with 4 students learning from home.  A couple of times per week, we would include them in a lesson, story, or activity via video conference.  The in-class students were so excited to see the home learners each week.  I think the home learners also felt included in the class, so much so that one by one, they started to return to in-class learning without much fanfare.  (Okay, that’s not totally true. The returning students didn’t have much difficulty when they returned, but the class would have thrown a party or staged a parade for each returning student when then re-entered the classroom.  It was as if they were coming back from space, not a few blocks over).   
  • Microphone.  Like mentioned before, the microphone (and small, powered speaker), allows me to be heard, lets me use a calm tone (not the loud, angry-sounding register), saves my voice, and focuses students.  

Looking back, I am astounded at how many decisions I made last year, modifying my class for COVID teaching, that had a design aspect.  Though the risers, alternative seating, community building, and high-interaction/engagement teaching are my jam, it looks like this COVID context learning will be with us for the foreseeable future.  Hopefully, intentional design decisions will help me navigate this next phase.  I'll let you know how it goes.  

Sunday, May 30, 2021

Creating Culture in a New School

One of the workshops that I am the most proud of was the one I did the first year at Smiling Creek.  Because I was really wrapped up in my work with Landscapes of Injustice, I had not done much to contribute to my new school, and in the first year of any school, everyone should pitch in something.  We had so many strong teachers that I was not so sure what I had to offer.  For the January school professional development day, the Pro D committee was thinking of doing something about building our new school culture.  So I volunteered to facilitate this process.

To be honest, I didn't have a clue about how to do this.  Sure, I had been to goal-setting sessions before and I had been in new schools before, but I didn't think what I seen in those situations would apply here.  As I mentioned before about the principal Remi, he was really about collaboration and sustainability, so anything we did to build a school culture was going to be done together as a staff and would have to be doable over a long time.  

Our process was clear:

  1. Build a shared vision, together.
  2. Overthrow the (educational) world.
  3. Have recess.
The collaborative part was the key to everything.  We needed a vision we thought was: worth doing,  doable, and something everyone on staff could see their way in to doing that vision.

The repeating method was:
  1. Do an individual task.
  2. Each person shares their ideas, thoughts, and feelings to a group of 4.  The rest of the group listens without interrupting.
  3. Once everyone has shared, the group discusses what they noticed: patterns, similarities, BIG IDEAS and what is important to the group.
We did this method several times for different tasks that built on each other.


Step 1: Individual Bio Maps

  The first task was the Bio Map, an individual Value and Biographical Map of each group member.  According to Parker Palmer, we teach who we are and because we were a new school, it was important to get a better sense of each other.  The Bio Map got teachers to share what they thought about, what they cared about, what they liked to do or create, and the kinds of experiences, they had.

[I collected these individual maps and still have them.  We were all over the map in terms of thinking, doing, and experiences, but we all prioritized family and belonging.].



Step 2: Smeek, the group map

The second time was a Smeek (for Smiling Creek), a group map of shared team values.  Each group filled this in collaboratively as a team, now that we knew each other better from the individual Bio Maps.  As we filled in the team Smeek, we thought about our composite Smiling Creek students, and asked what is important, what do we want our students to know or think about, to do or make, and to experience?

After working through this Smeek, each team came back and shared with the whole staff.  While each team shared, the other teams listened, without interruption, for patterns, similarities, and priorities.  After all teams shared, we had a full group discussion.  

[Yup, still have these too.  Looking at them now, they are incredibly detailed.  This says a lot about the staff.  I think the sharing that day increased the level of trust and understanding, so much so that the ideas and collaboration started to flow.  Because of the detail I can't believe we were able to come up with anything so succinct and focused in Step 3].


Step 3: Synthesis and Consensus
The third step was the hardest and best part.  We took what we discussed and then synthesized what we knew about our school and what was important to us into a manifestation of our shared vision.  It could be in the form of a T-shirt mock up, a slogan, a motto, a mission statement, a song, a poem, a rap, etc.  Whatever each group came up with had to sum up what we wanted Smiling Creek's culture to be, it had to be short and memorable, and it had to be simple enough for the students and the public to understand (no teacher speak).  The big thing to remember for the statement was: "Our statement is for and about kids.
(I created this example to set the bar low.)


It is important to note in this retelling that I ran out of time at this point in my workshop.  I didn't think we'd even get this far, but everyone was so driven.  I started to wrap things up in my presentation, when Taryn stopped me and said we needed to finish this, now.  Everyone agreed.  Awesome.  It was no longer my workshop, but a staff mission.

After a quick break and a little more work time, groups shared.  There was a symbolic T-shirt logos, an acrostic poem spelling out SMILE, mission statements, clusters of post-it notes grouped together in clusters, etc.  I was blown away with the work, heart, and creativity the groups put into these manifestations.  

As a staff we came to consensus with one group's mission statement because it seemed to include bits of everything the other groups had.  It was:
  • be CARING
  • think BIG
  • feel INSPIRED
Everyone loved it.  It was clear, inclusive, and something students could do and remember.  It felt like the right order, too.  By the next day, we included another line to be more action oriented:
  • be CARING
  • think BIG
  • feel INSPIRED
  • make a DIFFERENCE
A couple of years later and this is still our guiding motto.  It is on shirts, bracelets, letterhead, classroom signs, etc.  I try to refer to the motto when appropriate and embed it in lessons that same way I embed the Core Competencies.  I noticed that our new principal, Ross, also refers to it every day on the announcements so it continues to be part of the Smiling Creek philosophy even with so many changes happening to the school over the years.  

For me, the biggest highlight was the watching the staff.  We really came together to work on something together to do work that mattered.  The shared vision came from a shared purpose.  I felt that it was a big step forward for us.  I look forward to post COVID when we can do something like this again.

Sunday, May 02, 2021

Woodprojects in the Classroom 4: Student Design Challenge: T's New Workspace

 Following the success of the 3 Pieces of Wood project, a new project emerged naturally.  

As the year progressed, it became clear that one of my students, T, needed to change where her workspace was.  She was in and out of the classroom for sensory breaks and because her workspace was far from the classroom door, she would get distracted and not make it all the way there.  We needed to move her workspace closer to the door, but because her table was so big, it would not fit there.  We tried regular student desks in the past for her, but she kicked them around and was resistant to them because other students did not use them very much.  

What you have to know about T is that the students loved her very much, she was the friendliest kid and also the most stubborn kid we had all ever met.  Even though she was not fully verbal, you always knew exactly how she felt and what she wanted to do, and especially what she DIDN'T want to do. T needed a small workspace, but there was no way we were going to get her to use a typical student desk.  T was also the smallest student by far, so she would need a custom workspace.  

After conferring with Mrs. G (T's knowledgeable education assistant), we came up with a strategy.  Below is a Learning Story I created with the students using their words after we finished.  [My words are in square brackets.]


Student Designers to the Rescue 

This is T’s old work space. 
It took up a lot of space and her feet didn't touch the ground.





When we had to move T’s work space,
we realized we needed something different:

  • Something that fit T.
  • Something that took up less space.
  • Something that fit with our classroom.


We measured T.

•      We like building.
•      It was fun working together. 



We made our own designs, shared them with each other, and gave them to our teacher.
Our teacher took parts from our designs and
put them together, then he made T a work space
This is the sheet we used.
(using left over wood and grade 8 woodworking skills).


Our teacher took parts from our designs and put them together.  Then he made T a workspace.   This is us building.




This is when it was done building.



The finished project
•    This is T’s new workspace. 
•    The desk is epic.

[It was truly epic.  The students went with a mini-riser design that fit in perfectly with the group risers.  The seat was low, long, and heavy.  It fit T's needs (her size, her comfort, the way she would use it, and the product and process made her feel special but not unusual).  And it fit our needs (easily moved by us, not easily moved or kicked by T, sturdy and bottom-heavy so as not to tip, small so it would fit by the door, the sled bottom with felt pads made it quiet, etc.).  The students/designers even gave the design a name, the "Miss T." ]

Miriam Miller came in a helped us think about what we did and learned.


Personal and Social Responsibility
•     It was challenging but fun.
•     We felt some pressure to do a good job, but it felt good in the end.
•     We took our time to do this. 
•     We made some mistakes but we learned from them. 

Personal and Social Responsibility
How did we use these?

[Empathic Design:
•       Empathy is thinking about how someone else feels (Standing in someone else’s shoes)
•       Design is making things from our ideas, to make something useful (helping others)]

•      Like the 3 pieces of wood project
•      But we did T’s desk together and we were able to use more pieces of wood
•      Working together can be better [new ideas, help if we get stuck] and harder sometimes [slower]
•      We had to think about T’s needs [thinking from her perspective]
•      We had to be polite [and inclusive].
•      We had to ask her to measure her.  Mrs. G was very knowledgeable. 


Epilogue

Unfortunately, at the end of the year, T's guardian, her grandma, let me know that they were moving.  With hesitance, Grandma asked if she could buy the Miss T desk because she'd heard about the success we'd had with it.  I laughed and said she could have it for free because it had literally been made for T.  Like the students, I don't miss the Miss T desk at all, but I sure miss the little kid with the big smile who sat in it.

Sunday, April 25, 2021

Wood Projects in the Classroom 3: Student Designs*

 Kids love to build.  I have Keva, Kinex, Lego, and Tinkertoy in my classroom, but the most popular building material in my class was this big bag of off cuts I had that were leftovers from my garage wood shop.  These off cuts were so, so popular.  

And they had to go.

Like any great (and failed) relationship, it started off slowly.  No one noticed the lumpy bag in the corner filled with dusty misshapen wood.  During Choice Time, students gravitated toward other centres and other building materials.  Then one day, this quiet kid noticed the lonely bag in the corner and took a chance on it.  He built a little ramp for cars, and shared it with the class during check in time.  The next day, a few kids joined him and all was right with the world.  

By the next week, all the building kids and a few other converts were right into the big blue bag.  I brought in another bag of off cuts that were cluttering up my garage, but it took no time for those to get grabbed up too.  And then the fighting began.

Some students hoarded and hid their favourite pieces.  They argued with each other and with me over the off cuts, especially when it was time to clean up.  It was loud, it was sloppy, but most of all, it was unpleasant.  My sharing, caring, cooperative community turned into greedy, suspicious hoarders.  I'd had enough, so I decided that the off cuts had to go.  

At a class meeting, I told my students the problem, and asked them why they didn't have the same problem with other building materials.  The students admitted that the off cuts were bigger so they could make really tall structures or long ramps, and because the off cuts were not all the same shape or same size (a la Keva or Lego) they could do some really unusual things with them.  We'd tried many group and individual problem solving strategies over the off cuts situation, but I decided it was time to end our relationship with the off cuts.  


The 3 Pieces of Wood Project

Instead of just taking the two big bags of off cuts home (I was trying to reduce the clutter in my garage, remember?), I tasked the students with a design project:  

    • What could you make from 3 pieces of wood? 
    • Design something that would not end up as garbage, but would HELP the world.

In turns, each student chose 3 pieces of wood (2 short and one long).  They designed their creation on paper, then they glued their pieces together.  I gave them demonstrations of what glued well (face to face works better than end to end, etc.).  Each student presented their creation and the rest of the class gave them feedback.


Student Designs


Student V

I designed a bookshelf.  I chose this design because my dad bought this other shelf, but he didn’t have the nails for it. This will help the world better by making more room for books!





Student T

I made a chicken decoration for my grandma and my grandpa.  

I used 3 pieces of wood. One looks like a chicken because I like chicken. The chicken is SO cute.

This makes me very happy. D thinks it’s cool too. A thinks it is really good.





Student I

I designed a small resting place for birds.

The way it works is you attach a string to it, hang it on a string to it, hang it on a branch, and then a bird comes along and sits on it. 

The way it will improve the world is by helping birds rest.

This makes me feel good. 





Student E

I designed a stuffy holder.

The way it works is I put my stuffies on the flat part.

It helps so my room is not filled with stuffies.

I enjoyed making this.


Student D

I designed two things in one:  you can put your pictures at the top and hang your coat on the bottom. 

This will make the world a better place because I always leave my jacket on the floor. Now I can hang it up. This will make my mom happy.

 I took it home and painted with acrylic paint because other materials did not have the exact colours. 


End Thoughts

It was awesome.  Students were very thoughtful about their designs, they gave feedback, the way they supported each other was amazing, they treated each other better, they learned a whole bunch of things, and I got rid of a bunch of garage clutter.


*The events described in this post happened last year before COVID.

T gives D some positive feedback on his Shark design.